Chandigarh, July 7: A wide range of political figures and institutional representatives have joined calls for the restoration of the biographical film ‘Satluj’ on domestic streaming services. Prominent voices argued that the project serves as a cinematic exploration of important socio-historical narratives and stated that restricting public access sends an undesirable message regarding creative liberties.
The project, originally created under the title ‘Punjab 95’, traces the extensive real-life investigations of Jaswant Singh Khalra during the late twentieth century. Its sudden removal occurred just two days into its release window, despite the project having already resolved extensive evaluation cycles with the Central Board of Film Certification over a three-year period.
Expressing concern over the sudden development, Congress MP Dharamvira Gandhi described the restriction as an unfortunate outcome for free expression. Gandhi asserted, “The film attempts to introduce younger generations to a turbulent phase in Punjab’s history while encouraging discussion on human rights and governance.”
Shiromani Akali Dal president Sukhbir Singh Badal expanded on the cultural importance of the project, classifying it as a vital artistic tribute to a significant historical figure. Badal declared that the decision represented “an attack on collective memory, truth and freedom of expression.” He maintained that honest dialogue remains crucial for cultural growth and reconciliation.
Digital service provider ZEE5 clarified that it continues to value the artistic vision of the creators and is actively exploring appropriate procedural frameworks to address the situation. Meanwhile, regional representatives continue to advocate for a swift resolution. Senior leader Sukhpal Singh Khaira maintained that the factual basis of the film is supported by judicial records, stating, “The removal of this fact-based film is in contradiction to the decision of Supreme Court of India that upheld the conviction of guilty police officers responsible for the abduction of Prof Khalra.”
AAP representative Malvinder Singh Kang questioned the selective restriction of historical content and appealed for uniform standards in the digital entertainment space. Kang maintained, “History should be confronted honestly rather than hidden through silence or censorship,” calling for the film to be made accessible once more to the public.
